Knowing how AI works is secondary
Piotr Bombol is one of my favourite thinkers on AI in strategy. Because he's also a doer. He co-founded Adaily. He's building useful things. And, believe it or not, he argues knowing how AI works is secondary. Neat.
I spoke to Piotr about his new product, and some implications about how AI will play a role in the lives of strategists. Below you will find the full video, questions worth asking, and a special free demo at the end!
(Disclosure: I'm an advisor to Adaily.)
Full conversation
Questions worth asking
We all like to feel some agency and control. But how does this change as you get more senior? And how does it change based on your preferred style of working? Which styles benefit the most?
I buy that juniors are more willing to work with AI because it feels natural to how things are. But this is only useful if they learn practical ways to develop their taste. What are those ways?
If taste is important, how do we determine whose taste matters? Does this mean knowing how to sell your thinking and persuade others to come on your taste journey become more important?
Could we reframe the role of AI tools from a replacer of skills to an accelerator of taste? Could curated AI environments act as exposure therapy for quality, which eventually rubs off on you?
In the age of AI, do we need to develop our ability to think in analogies to make sense of new concepts fast? And if so, how do we train ourselves with analogical thoughts not just artificial ones?
Free demo
I've been using Adaily 2.0 for a few weeks and there's so much potential there. If you want to go deeper into it as well, I got two options for you:
Watch their launch video here, or a longer product overview here
Sign up for a free trial of Adaily 2.0 here
